On this page
- Buy the published EN 55032:2015 base
- Emissions and immunity are separate questions
- Build the test configuration before comparing prices
- Evidence questions for a multimedia supplier
- Example: a display terminal with optional peripherals
- Managing the document and product baseline
- Frequently asked buying questions
- Related guidance
- Explore more standards buying guides
Buy the published EN 55032:2015 base
EN 55032:2015 is listed as published. Separate published amendments are A1:2020 and A11:2020. The record also identifies AC:2016-07; its scope states that the June 2016 corrigendum is included. A successor and FprAB:2026 are in development. These details were checked twice on 7 October 2026.
Confirm the supplied package, language, licence, format and checkout total.
Emissions and immunity are separate questions
The catalogue scope addresses multimedia equipment emissions and identifies two equipment classes. It focuses on protecting radio services and repeatable measurements. EN 55035 is the separate multimedia immunity subject.
Ask the assessor to explain the scope decision and proposed equipment class for your product. Then agree what the service quotation covers. An emissions report answers its defined emissions assignment; use a document register to keep other assessment work visible instead of merging everything under “EMC passed”.
Build the test configuration before comparing prices
| Configuration detail | Purchasing question |
|---|---|
| Product models | Which variants are represented, and who explains that choice? |
| Connections | Which cables, accessories and connected equipment form the proposed setup? |
| Operating modes | Which functions are exercised, and what support does the laboratory need? |
| Report scope | What identifies the sample, configuration, reference set and limitations? |
These questions help define a commercial assignment. The standard and responsible assessor determine the technical assessment details. A buyer should be able to trace the reported sample to the product being ordered without needing to reconstruct the setup from separate emails.
Evidence questions for a multimedia supplier
- Does the report identify the delivered model and its relevant options?
- Which amendments form part of the stated assessment basis?
- Are the supplied power source, cables and accessories represented in the evidence?
- Which product variants or configurations remain outside the report scope?
- Who reviews changes to the enclosure, electronics, ports or accessories?
Put the same questions to all bidders. One supplier may offer existing evidence for a standard model, while another includes assessment of the customised product. Compare the cost and time of the remaining work alongside the unit price.
Example: a display terminal with optional peripherals
A buyer orders a multimedia display terminal with an optional printer and a different external power supply. The existing report identifies the terminal's earlier configuration. The buyer prepares a model-and-accessory table and asks the supplier to connect each quoted item to evidence.
Any unrepresented configuration is then described to the assessor before a testing quotation is accepted. The order records the final accessory list and the agreed report deliverable. This is a purchasing example, not a finding that the changed terminal needs any particular test or equipment class.
Managing the document and product baseline
Keep the European base, amendments and any confirmed correction information together in the document register. Ask whether the seller offers the set as separate files or a consolidated product. Do not infer consolidation from the base publication's title.
For product evidence, preserve the original edition references rather than replacing them with the newest date. Where an older report is proposed, ask what work connects it to the current product and project basis. That explanation is more informative than a badge stating only “EMC compliant”.
Frequently asked buying questions
Does EN 55032 cover immunity?
The verified title is emissions. Define immunity and any other EMC assignments separately with the assessor.
Which equipment class should I choose?
Provide the intended use and environment to the responsible assessor and request a documented decision. This guide does not select a class for an unspecified product.
Is the draft successor the current purchase?
The linked product is the published 2015 European base. Keep development documents distinct from the published references agreed for your assessment.
Related guidance
Read the multimedia immunity guide and the electrotechnical standards overview.
Explore more standards buying guides
Browse standards by reference and subject to compare related document choices.
Editorial information
How this page is maintained
No documented technical review of this version is recorded. Sources and an update date are not a conformity assessment.
Scope: Multimedia equipment emissions; original buying guidance on configuration, evidence and distinction from immunity without technical limits or legal citation claims.
View registered primary sources
Keep this guide useful
Your reading list and topic feeds
Saves stay on this browser. Feeds cover guidance on this website, not every change to a standard.