On this page
- Select the published European document set
- What the public scope tells a buyer
- Define the observation assignment
- Questions before accepting an EMC quotation
- Example: a networked information kiosk
- Keep evidence usable for the next purchase
- Frequently asked buying questions
- Related guidance
- Explore more standards buying guides
Select the published European document set
EN 55035:2017 is listed as published. Genorma lists a separate published A11:2020 amendment and a successor in development. Edition and status were checked twice on 7 October 2026. Confirm the complete package required by your project.
Check language, format, licence and the seller's final checkout total.
What the public scope tells a buyer
The public scope describes multimedia equipment immunity, intended operation in its environment and reproducible testing. The A11 record identifies its purpose as completing the list of superseded standards. Emissions are a separate EN 55032 subject.
For procurement, describe the functions that matter to the intended use: for example, displaying information, communicating or processing an input. Ask the laboratory what functional information and monitoring support it needs. A box that powers on is not a complete description of a multimedia product's intended behaviour.
Define the observation assignment
| Briefing item | Question to agree |
|---|---|
| Functions | Which intended functions and configurations are being assessed? |
| Support equipment | What connected equipment or fixtures will represent normal operation? |
| Observation | How will the responsible team explain acceptable behaviour for the assessment? |
| Evidence | How will observations and the assessed setup be documented? |
This map does not prescribe performance criteria or test levels. Those decisions belong to the standard and the responsible assessor. It helps a purchasing team recognise the preparation work that must be included in a service offer.
Questions before accepting an EMC quotation
- Which product models and operating modes are covered by the offer?
- Who supplies the functional description and assists with monitoring?
- Does the assessment basis name the European amendments?
- How are report limitations and unassessed variants communicated?
- Who explains the consequences of later hardware, software or accessory changes?
Compare quotations using the same function list and configuration schedule. If a supplier offers a report prepared for a related model, ask for a comparison that identifies the differences. If a laboratory requests a special operating mode, agree who will prepare it and how it connects to the final product.
Example: a networked information kiosk
A facilities buyer orders kiosks that display visitor information and read a user input. The supplier provides an EMC report for the display hardware, but the quoted installation includes a new reader and application software. The buyer asks for a clear description of the functions and configuration represented in the report.
The proposed assessor receives that description and is asked to define the remaining assessment work and required support. The purchase order then names the report deliverable and assigns responsibility for providing a working sample. The example illustrates scope coordination; it does not establish the kiosk's technical performance criteria.
Keep evidence usable for the next purchase
A report can be more useful when it has an identifiable setup, software version and accessory list. Ask the supplier how it controls those records and which changes it reviews. Keep the final delivered configuration in the procurement file so the next buyer can compare an updated model without guessing.
For the standard itself, record the base edition and amendments as separate items unless the seller confirms a consolidated package. A withdrawn correction or a draft successor shown in a catalogue should not be silently added to the order. Resolve the exact package with the responsible technical team.
Frequently asked buying questions
Is this an emissions standard?
The verified title concerns immunity. A purchasing brief should identify the emissions assignment separately where relevant.
Does an immunity report cover every software variant?
Read its stated scope and configuration, then ask how the proposed variant relates to that evidence. A broad product-family name alone is insufficient to answer the question.
Does the EN publication establish current legal citation?
This guide verifies the publication and assists buying. Have current legal citations and the specific product route checked separately when that conclusion is needed.
Related guidance
Continue with multimedia emissions purchasing and the electrotechnical overview.
Explore more standards buying guides
Browse standards by reference and subject to compare related document choices.
Editorial information
How this page is maintained
No documented technical review of this version is recorded. Sources and an update date are not a conformity assessment.
Scope: Multimedia equipment immunity; original assessment purchasing questions distinguish emissions and avoid prescribed test levels or performance criteria.
View registered primary sources
Keep this guide useful
Your reading list and topic feeds
Saves stay on this browser. Feeds cover guidance on this website, not every change to a standard.